| In science a new word is often needed for a
new concept. leading to confusion if a word in common use is given a
different scientific meaning to that available in the dictionary, as is
unfortunately often done. The situation can become even worse in
translation to a different language.
The word 'terrane' is therefore a deliberate corruption of the common
word 'terrain', which refers only to a land surface. Its scientific
meaning refers to a block of continental material from its surface right
down to its base just above the mantle. An 'exotic terrane' extends the
concept to a block of material that has broken away from a continent,
and moved until it collides and fuses somewhere else, a process
sometimes referred to as 'docking'. where its presence can give rise to
an apparently confused geology over a fairly small area.
Not all terranes are small, of course. India is a large example, and
whilst on passage from Gondwanaland near the South Pole to its present
location docked on to southern Asia, it must have been isolated like
present day Australia, which is probably an undocked terrane destined to
join onto another continent in the far distant future. Greenland and
Cyprus may also be examples, with the Seychelles as further candidates
as they are made of continental materials which raise special problems
in their present location.
The idea of terranes was first developed in the United States, where the
concept made an immediate impact on the understanding of the geology of
western coastal regions. Indeed even the inexplicable geology of Alaska
has lately succumbed to investigation. Alaska has been found to be "a
collage of terranes dismembered and repositioned over the past 160
million years by the wanderings and collisions of crustal plates, the
flotsam of the ancient, vanished ocean that preceded the Pacific". (This
is a direct quotation from the paper also titled "Terranes" by David G
Howell)
Locally, too. the idea seems to be fruitful. There are several areas of
this country where geology appears to change too suddenly for ordinary
explanations, or where other anomalies exist such as traces of volcanic
rock 'with no apparent volcanoes, or ophiolites where rocks not far away
show no sign of abnormality. Suspicions are arising that this country,
in common with other areas fringing the continental basement. contains
many exotic terranes. some of which docked a long time ago and therefore
share much of their geological history with the region on which they
docked, but some more recently so that they share at most only a thin
veneer of local sediments. Students of Geology may well have seen and
puzzled over such features in Scotland, North Wales, Anglesey and
Cornwall, during field trips. But the thought may now be entertained
that adjacent areas may possibly have had a different geological history
as part of a different territory or even a different continent.
Elegant, simple ideas like this deserve to be true, but there is still
work to be done to explain how exotic terranes can cross oceans, if
oceans always grow from mid-ocean ridges towards the continents under
which they are subducted. Suggestions are being made that perhaps they
move only along the edges of continents, in the way that, for example.
Baja California is moving because of the San Andreas Fault, but this
certainly does not fit for India, Australia, or Alaska.
It occurs to me, also, that there is still room for amateur speculation
in such recent ideas. For example. the stability of small pieces of
continent once they have developed an independent existence does not
seem to have been investigated. Pieces of continent floating on the
mantle will not be exempt from the general rules governing flotation and
stability, of which some insight can be gained by floating odd-shaped
pieces of wood on water. A thin flat slab will not float with its
surface vertical, but will roll over until the surface is parallel with
the water. A squarish block is unlikely to have any surface parallel to
the water when it becomes stable, and might even finish with its
diagonal vertical. Thus, a wide slab broken from a continent will
obviously remain level as it floats on the mantle below, but a piece
narrower than the continent is thick, typically about 35 kms. would be
expected to roll over on to its side, no doubt revealing some very
interesting rocks in the process. The island of Naxos, in the Aegean Sea
could well be an example of this effect, although orthodox opinion has a
much more complex explanation. An intermediate slab up to perhaps three
or four times as wide as it is thick would not remain level, raising one
edge and lowering the other, causing a regional dip to stratified rocks
that would probably be preserved after docking. The high side might also
raise fragments of ocean floor - this would be the place to look for
ophiolites the presence of which would also suggest that neighbouring
granites may well have been uplifted rather than intruded.
No doubt time will resolve these problems. New work like this shows once
again that Geology is not a dry, static subject, as many suppose, but is
dynamic and entertaining.
|